|
課程名稱 |
專題討論下
SEMINAR (2) |
|
開課學期 |
97-2 |
|
授課對象 |
哲學系 |
|
授課教師 |
苑舉正 |
|
課號 |
Phl4998 |
|
課程識別碼 |
104 40802 |
|
班次 |
03 |
|
學分 |
1 |
|
全/半年 |
全年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期三1(8:10~9:00) |
|
上課地點 |
哲314 |
|
備註 |
本課程中文授課,使用英文教科書。限已申請者選修。
限本系所學生(含輔系、雙修生)
總人數上限：1人 |
|
|
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
本課程的主要方向在於，為修習專題討論的學生，提供一個從事研究發展的理解。本專題討論的主要題目為「The Philosophical Problems and Reactions from Barber Paradox to Liar Paradox」其教學內容分為四個方向：
第一、從歷史的角度，檢視羅素在提出「悖論」的原初動機以及其日後所面對的困難。
第二、從最根本的邏輯基本定律裡，介紹幾種悖論的形式。
第三、從實際的日常用語中，討論悖論發生的可能性與解決之道。
第四、從「實際」的發展過程中，例證悖論之發展有助於應用邏輯與哲學於日常生活之中。
|
|
課程目標 |
促使學習學生能夠透過「邏輯」與「語言哲學」兩者之間的關係，針對悖論本質進行探討，並因而理解語言與邏輯之限制。 |
|
課程要求 |
這位同學必須在課前閱讀所印發之講義與指定的書籍外，還必須踴躍在課堂中發問與討論。另外，修課同學也應當針對所有文章後所附帶之書目，自行視修課內容需要，參考閱讀。 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
|
|
參考書目 |
Benthem, J.F. van (1978) our Paradoxes Journal of Philosophical Logic 7: 492.
Beth, E.W. (1964) The Foundations of Mathematics, Amsterdam: North Holland.
Cantor, G. (1991) Briefe (Letters), ed. H. Meschkowski and W. Nilson, Berlin: Springer.
Church, A. (1971) ogic, History of, IV: Modern Logic in Encyclopaedia Britannica vol. 14: 231.
Fraenkel, A.A., Bar-Hillel, Y. and Levy, A. (1973) Foundations of Set Theory, Amsterdam: North Holland.
Garciadiego, A. (1985) he Emergence of the Non-Logical Paradoxes of the Theory of Sets, 19031908 Historia Mathematica 12: 3371.
Heijenoort, J. van (ed.) (1967) From Frege to G鐰el: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879931, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hessenberg, G. (1906) Grundbegriffe der Mengenlehre (Fundamental Concepts of Set Theory), G飆tingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Hughes, P. and Brecht, G. (1975) Vicious Circles and Infinity: A Panoply of Paradoxes, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Moore, G.H. (1978) he Origins of Zermelo Axiomatization of Set Theory Journal of Philosophical Logic 7: 3079.
Moore, G.H. (1982) Zermelo Axiom of Choice: Its Origins, Development, and Influence, New York: Springer.
Moore, G.H. (1988) he Roots of Russell Paradox Russell: The Journal of the Bertrand Russell Archives, new series, 8: 1466.
Moore, G.H. and Garciadiego, A. (1981) urali-Forti Paradox: A Reappraisal of its Origins Historia Mathematica 8: 3190.
Rang, B. and Thomas, W. (1981) ermelo Discovery of the Russell Paradox Historia Mathematica 8: 152.
Russell, B.A.W. (1898) n Analysis of Mathematical Reasoning, Being an Inquiry into the Subject Matter, the Fundamental Conceptions, and the Necessary Postulates of Mathematics in The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 2, Philosophical Papers 18969, ed. N. Griffin and A.C. Lewis, London: Routledge, 1990, 15542.
Russell, B.A.W. (1899) he Fundamental Ideas and Axioms of Mathematics in The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 2, Philosophical Papers 18969, ed. N. Griffin and A.C. Lewis, London: Routledge, 1990, 26105.
Russell, B.A.W. (1903) The Principles of Mathematics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2nd edn, London: Allen & Unwin, 1937; repr. London: Routledge, 1992.
Russell, B.A.W. (1906) es paradoxes de la logique Revue de m彋aphysique et de morale 14: 6270; trans. n Insolubilia and their Solution by Symbolic Logic in Essays in Analysis, ed. D. Lackey, London: Allen & Unwin, 1973.
Russell, B.A.W. (1993) The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 3, Toward the rinciples of Mathematics19002, ed. G.H. Moore, London and New York: Routledge.
Rtow, A. (1910) Der Lner (The Liar), Leipzig: Teubner. (The liar paradox.)
S. Bauer-Mengelberg, roof that Every Set can be Well-Ordered in J. van Heijenoort (ed.) From Frege to G鐰el: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879931, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967, 1391.
|
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
|